Subversion

კოლექტივ Subversion-ის ორი პატარა ტექსტი. პირველში კოლექტივი მოკლედ გამოთქვამს საკუთარ პრინციპებს, მეორეში კი ის პასუხს სცემს კითხვებს ანარქიზმის, მარქსიზმის და ამ ორ ტრადიციასთან საკუთარი დამოკიდებულების შესახებ. Subversion ხაზს უსვამს ამ ორი ტრადიციის მიღმა განვითარების აუცილებლობას.

Correspondence on primitivsm. Green Anarchist reply to letters in Subversion #22. Steve from Hastings replies to them. From 1997.

Subversion on "People's Charter for Social Justice", launched originally by the Merseyside Port Shop Stewards Committee.

In this reply to a regular correspondent, we explain in greater detail two of the points in our statement of "What We Stand For" - our attitude towards trade unions, and our opposition to the political organisations of capitalism's Left Wing. - From Subversion #23.

Subversion reviews of "A Ballad Against Work" and "Reflections on Marx's Critique of Political Economy".

Some comments on Subversion 21, especially 'Green Communism', the piece on Getting a Job and P's letter on the JSA. A letter to Subversion, with reponse from them.

An exchange on the refusal of work from Subversion #23

The following are two independent replies to 'A Reply to Two Comrades from Nottingham'. Both are written in a personal capacity and do not necessarily reflect the views of other members of Nottingham Campaign Against the Job Seekers Allowance (recently renamed Nottingham Claimants Action). The first, "Doling It Out", is by one of the Two Comrades, the second, "State Power and Class Solidarity", is by two members of…

A response to the article 'Only Doing Your Job?' on campaigns against the Job Seekers Allowance, which appeared in issue 22 of Subversion. The debate (which is picked up in subsequent articles in this issue) is especially concerned with the role of workers in benefits offices.

Discussons on resistance the Job Seekers Allowance, and a member of Class War's views on nationalism.

The following article was written by the publishers of the magazine, The Poor, The Bad and The Angry. we ripped it off for Subversion becasue it develops at gretare length some of the points we express in our own set of basic principles - What We Stand For (See Subversion 18).

Article from January 1997 in Subversion